It is common knowledge that a woman's sexual attractiveness declines rapidly once she hits her mid to late 30's. As much as I don't like to admit it, I see it in my wife. At 40, her signs of aging have been coming on quite quickly lately. Still, I love her and want to be around her. Even if the financial threat of divorce wasn't hanging over my head, I would continue to have her as my wife as she proved herself as an honest individual who has more to offer than sex. In essence, she has successfully encountered the wall in good shape. She has a family and a purpose to life. This is not the case with many of our her old classmates on Facebook. The stories of vacations with guys I saw 10 years ago are becoming rare, and you see more photos of pets and food they made.
Looking at it from a biological perspective, this makes sense. It takes about 20 years to raise a kid to adulthood, and if you have several kids, this process takes another 15 years to have a full litter from youngest to oldest. This 35 years of child rearing takes a long time. If one of those cat ladies was able to attract a man at 40, she would be 75 by the last one leaves the house. This is clearly impossible. God (or nature, for the atheists out there) clearly wants the woman to start reproducing early to have the most viable offspring. As such, "the wall" is this desire put on men to find the youngest and healthiest women they can. It puts the desire of correct thinking women to commit herself to a man while she is still young and viable to start a family.
If the wall did not exist, half of the guys out there would be wasting their cajones on women who are unable to have children. The benefits for women to pair bond would disappear. If they could count on guys to give them things out of sheer horniness throughout their lives, there would be no reason for them to commit to a guy, improve themselves beyond being sexually attractive, or have him around as a father.
Sadly, one of the lies told by feminism is that the wall does not exist, that she can continue to have guys commit to her throughout her life. "Sex in the City" is a good example. Sure, some guys will be willing to have meaningless sex with a woman who is post wall, but having a guy commit his life to her when there is little for her to offer is entirely different. Her marriage market value crashes before many feminists even realize. Hence, you got this game of "Chicken" that women have been playing with their biological clock, hoping to snag a provider in the last second before she runs over the cliff. For those women, they wind up lamenting "Where have all the good men gone". Guys are catching onto this game, and are refusing to be her safety net anymore. Hopefully, more young girls will see the mistakes of their single mothers and act accordingly.
Comments
Post a Comment