The p3k couldn't grok a few simple paragraphs of diseased rambling so I went straight to the source -- Google Translate.
Please accept these snippets in the spirit in which they were given.
SOCIAL ECONOMY AND ECONOMIC ECONOMY
introduction
1. The industrial revolution and its consequences have been a disaster for human society. They add hope to the lives of people in the "developed" countries, but the death of society makes life incomplete, angry and causes psychological distress in the world (also in the third world) rather than suffering physically). great damage to the natural world. Seeking technological advances will only aggravate the situation. In fact, this will upset people and cause more damage to the natural world, lead to worse social problems and psychological distress, and can cause even more physical problems even for those in “developing countries.Industrial and Technological systems may or may not be rejected. If he recovers, he will eventually reach a lower level of mental and psychological distress, but only after going through a long and painful process of rehabilitation and with limited exposure to humans and many other creatures. . the company's only product and machine engineering organizations. In addition, if the system is to survive, the consequences are inevitable: there is no way to repair or alter the system to prevent people's humility and personality.
3. If the system collapses, the result will always be painful. But if the system is large, the worst effect is its damage, so if it's damaged, it's better to destroy it than before.
4. We therefore advocate a revolution against the industrial system. This revolution may or may not serve violence; it can be a sudden or slow process that takes decades. We can't predict anything. But we generally consider the steps that those who hate the industrial system should take a revolutionary approach against social order. It will not be an economic revolution. Its purpose is to bring down not the government but the economic and technological foundation of today's society.
5. In this article, we focus on some of the negative developments that have been made in industrial systems and technology. Other developments that we have briefly mentioned or ignored. This does not mean that we consider other developments to be inappropriate. For practical reasons, we should limit our conversation to a public place or to a place where we have something new to say. For example, because of the well-established environmental movement and forests, we write very little about environmental degradation or prevention, even if it is very important.
New psychological science
6. Almost everyone agrees that we are in a very vibrant community. Biology is one of the common manifestations of interpretation in our world, so the discussion of left-wing psychology can be the starting point for a discussion of contemporary social problems. ,
7. But what is the rest? In the first half of the twentieth century the leftist society could be determined. Nowadays, the movement mixes, and it is unclear who is right. When it comes to undergraduate students in this article, there is a lot of emphasis on social, sexual and 'fair' women, women, clothing and the disabled, human rights thinkers. animals and things. But not everyone associated with one of these movements is on the left. To speak on our left, we insist on not so much a movement or idea as a form of psychology, but a united front. What we mean by "left" is therefore much easier to understand when we talk about leftist ideology. (See also paragraphs 227-230).
8. However, our policies on the left are not as clear as we want them to be, but there is no guarantee that they will. All we are trying to do here is to estimate and estimate the two mental movements, which we consider to be the main function of today. We are not meant to tell the truth about leftist ideology. Again, our story tends to offend only the left. We open the question of how we talked about leftist politics in the nineteenth century and the beginning of the twelfth century.
9. The two psychological movements that support today's separation are "torture" and "violence". Fatigue appears to be a common feature of mobility, but overcrowding forms only part of modern divorce; But this episode is very dramatic.
Comments
Post a Comment