 |
| Funny? Yes. Encouraging relationships? No. |
We all are aware of the communist agenda within the media and to break up the family. Since women are the gatekeepers of sex and men are the gatekeepers of relationships, their attack is twofold.
Attacks on women by encouraging slutty behavior
Today we see women flaunt their sexuality all over the media. Sex sells, it always has. But recently things have really been turned up. Since the 1960’s, premarital sex has been pushed in songs, in movies and magazines until the point that it became expected in dating. Then since the 1990’s this idea of premarital sex has been amplified again in “hookup culture” where monogamous dating isn’t even required for sex to be expected.
Guys have always been horny, always have, always will. It is biological. In the distant past, men would do what it takes to get sex, which meant they would take a woman and commit his life to her through marriage. He would get exclusive access to her, she would get a lifetime of support for her and her family.
The media changed that by removing this bargaining chip from women. Her womb is no longer exclusive, neither does he have to commit himself to her in order to get sex. As sex became more available to the attractive men, those men are now deciding to play the field. In turn, the average women who was able to sleep with the attractive men in their youth, tend to want to get in a relationship when they are older, when they have fewer dating prospects. This same average women can now only attract a less-than-average man, and will therefore be dissatisfied with her marriage.
Attacks on women by reducing their attractiveness
I first noticed this phenomenon with Tina Turner back in the early 1980's. Here was this relatively attractive singer, but she was strutting around in a mini skirt in a masculine manner. We saw this behavior more and more with women like Rosanne Barr, and Rosie O'Donnell. These loud, crass, obnoxious women became more common. Tattoos, fat positivity, crass behavior, dyed hair, defacing themselves became more commonplace. Hollywood projected this image, and the women followed.
In addition to sexual attractiveness, feminists have worked tirelessly to reduce a woman's appeal outside the bedroom. A pleasant demeanor, a friendly bubbly personality, eagerness to please, and effort into dressing well is not commonplace anymore. Instead, we have rude, crass, unshaven, short haired, unpleasant women who think throwing on a sweatshirt and yogurt pants is "good enough". Once they passed the age that they look good regardless, they have lost their appeal.
From 15 to 40, a typical woman can get sex fairly easy from men, BUT attracting a man and convincing him to commit his life to her is much, much more difficult for her. I know of several good women who were in the prime of their lives and still frustrated that they couldn't attract men enough to marry them. This is the whole issue. Just because a woman can get wined and dined by attractive guys because they want sex, does not mean they can keep them.
Attacks on men by discouraging marriage
Since men are the gatekeepers of relationships instead of sex, the attack has to be different. One major way is to reduce the incentive for men to get into relationships.
Since the 1980’s we have seen a denigrating portrayal of the family man in the media. Ward cleaver has been replaced with Homer Simpson and jerry Seinfeld. Now the father is portrayed as this dumb oaf whose wife knows best. This disincentivizes men to take on the role.
Furthermore there are real life issues in family law which makes marriage more risky for the men. The risk of being financially ruined or having his children taken away is too great for many men and so they will bow out of the entire thought of a lifelong relationship. Feminists, the law and media have encouraged "No Fault Divorce" which leaves no penalty for women should they decide to divorce their husband for frivolous reasons. "I'm not happy" is no reason to destroy the lives of their husband or their kids. This fear of having their lives torn apart, their kids taken away, assets seized and child support/alimony has created such a hostile environment for men that many are refusing to get involved in.
Attacks on men by discouraging traditional roles
Men don't want to come home from one boss to be ruled by another boss at home. Yet this is what is portrayed by the media to men and women. The honor of being "Head of the Household" is gone if the wife leaves. Many feminists joke about "A man is only good for his wallet", "A woman needs a fish like a bicycle rides a man", "patriarchy" and whatever else. The woman leaving the home to work, leaving the kids in daycare, .......There are a million ways modern society is discouraging traditional roles.
If we allow a "modern society" dictate our family, chances are we will have no family. The modern simp is not attractive to women as he fails in his masculine role of leader and protector. If the woman works, he no longer is the provider. Also, women are refusing the traditional roles of wife, mother, and housekeeper. What is left is chaos, and no one wants that.
Comments
Post a Comment